DBPriceBook

Amazon ElastiCache vs Upstash Redis: pricing

Managed Redis / Valkey · snapshot captured June 2026

On entry cost, Upstash Redis has the lower entry cost (~$10/mo vs ~$12/mo). Amazon ElastiCache uses node-hour (by ram) or serverless (per gb-hour + ecpu) and Upstash Redis uses serverless per-request, with fixed monthly plans. Their representative entry tiers are ~$12/mo (cache.t4g.micro (0.5 GiB)) and ~$10/mo (Fixed 250 MB plan). For scale, at the top tier we list, Upstash Redis ($100/mo) is below Amazon ElastiCache ($160/mo). Prices are a June-2026 snapshot; verify on the linked vendor pricing page before relying on them.

Data as of June 2026.

Amazon ElastiCache vs Upstash Redis side by side

Sources: Amazon Web Services and Upstash pricing pages. snapshot captured June 2026 — verify before purchasing.
FactorAmazon ElastiCacheUpstash Redis
EngineRedis / ValkeyRedis / Valkey
VendorAmazon Web ServicesUpstash
Pricing modelNode-hour (by RAM) or serverless (per GB-hour + ECPU)Serverless per-request, with fixed monthly plans
Representative tiercache.t4g.micro (0.5 GiB)Fixed 250 MB plan
Est. entry / month~$12/mo~$10/mo
Free tier?NoYes
Free tier detailNo always-free node tier (historic 12-month t3/t4g.micro offer for new accounts may apply).Free: 500K commands/month, 256 MB max size, 10 GB bandwidth, 1 database.
Storage / extrasServerless option bills $0.084/GB-hour stored + $0.0023 per million ECPUs (Valkey rates), 100 MB minimum.Pay-as-you-go: $0.20 per 100K commands, storage $0.25/GB (first 1 GB free), bandwidth free to 200 GB then $0.03/GB.
Region noteUS East (N. Virginia), us-east-1, on-demand; for Valkey / Redis OSS.Global / regional; serverless per-command billing.

Sources: Amazon Web Services pricing · Upstash pricing.

Cheaper for small vs cheaper for scale

Small / starting out: Upstash Redis wins — it has a free tier. On a flat entry tier, Upstash Redis has the lower entry cost (~$10/mo vs ~$12/mo).

At scale: at the top tier we list, Upstash Redis ($100/mo) is below Amazon ElastiCache ($160/mo). Remember that Amazon ElastiCache is usage-based while Upstash Redis is usage-based, which flips the answer depending on whether your traffic is steady or spiky.

Verdict

On entry cost alone, Upstash Redis has the lower entry cost (~$10/mo vs ~$12/mo). But price is only part of the story: Amazon ElastiCache (tight aws/vpc integration and valkey + redis oss support) versus Upstash Redis (true serverless: pay per command, scales to zero, ideal for spiky/edge workloads). Read each full breakdown — Amazon ElastiCache and Upstash Redis — and model your real workload in the estimator.

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon ElastiCache or Upstash Redis cheaper?

On entry cost, Upstash Redis has the lower entry cost (~$10/mo vs ~$12/mo). And at the top tier we list, Upstash Redis ($100/mo) is below Amazon ElastiCache ($160/mo). The right answer depends on your workload size and traffic pattern — Amazon ElastiCache uses node-hour (by ram) or serverless (per gb-hour + ecpu) and Upstash Redis uses serverless per-request, with fixed monthly plans. snapshot captured June 2026.

Amazon ElastiCache vs Upstash Redis: which for a small project?

For a small project, lean to whichever has a usable free tier and the lower entry price. Amazon ElastiCache has no real free tier. Upstash Redis: Free: 500K commands/month, 256 MB max size, 10 GB bandwidth, 1 database.

Amazon ElastiCache vs Upstash Redis: which scales better on cost?

At scale, at the top tier we list, Upstash Redis ($100/mo) is below Amazon ElastiCache ($160/mo). Usage-based offerings (serverless) can be cheaper for spiky or low-duty workloads but more expensive for steady high throughput; provisioned/instance pricing is the opposite. Model your real traffic before deciding.

What is the pricing model for Amazon ElastiCache and Upstash Redis?

Amazon ElastiCache: Node-hour (by RAM) or serverless (per GB-hour + ECPU). Upstash Redis: Serverless per-request, with fixed monthly plans. Prices are a June-2026 snapshot; verify on the linked vendor pricing page before relying on them.

More comparisons

Last updated: 2026-06-20